From Co-Pilots to RAG: What Companies Should Do with AI
AI isn’t a moonshot anymore; it’s a toolbox, and the first question is what outcome you want next quarter. Start with co-pilots, which are assistants built into the apps you already use that suggest next steps, draft content, or automate routine clicks. Think Microsoft 365 Copilot or Google Workspace’s Gemini—turn them on, point them at approved docs, and set some basic rules. Those rules are your guardrails: clear boundaries like “only use these folders,” “don’t invent numbers,” and “ask a human if a policy is missing.” A small win here funds everything else.
Make co-pilots useful with simple, visible jobs: turn long emails into short replies, draft meeting notes, or outline slides from a spreadsheet. Measure time to first draft, edits per document, and tasks completed per hour so you know it’s working. Keep a human-in-the-loop—that just means a person reviews anything sensitive like pricing, legal text, or refunds before it goes out. If something goes wrong, it’s usually because the co-pilot didn’t have the right info or the guardrails were vague. Tighten the sources, clarify the rules, and keep going.
Before you reach for fancier ideas, take a beat on data basics. Decide where your truth lives—customer, product, and case data each need a “golden” home so your AI doesn’t argue with itself. Write down what you can and can’t use (consent, retention, access) so you’re not building on legal sand. If your data is messy, choose early use cases that tolerate mess—summaries and triage are forgiving—while you clean up the rest. Boring foundations make flashy wins stick.
Next up, LLMs—large language models that are great at reading and writing text. They draft emails, summarize notes, classify tickets, and explain steps, but they can hallucinate, which simply means “confidently making stuff up.” Cut hallucinations by telling the model exactly which sources it may use and what to do if info is missing (for example, say “Not found” instead of guessing). Ask for structured outputs—headings, tables, or a tiny JSON block—so results drop straight into your tools. Keep the review step for anything that hits customers or auditors.
To anchor answers in your own knowledge, use RAG (retrieval-augmented generation). RAG works in two steps: first, retrieve the most relevant passages from your documents; second, have the model generate an answer using only those passages. Under the hood you’ll hear about embeddings (vector fingerprints of text) and a vector database (a place to search those fingerprints quickly). The payoff is fresher, auditable answers without training a custom model. Ask the system to cite sources so reviewers can click and verify.
Classic ML still shines on numbers: churn, lead score, demand forecast, or fraud risk. Start simple—logistic regression or gradient boosting often beats a complicated science project—and only get fancy if accuracy stalls. Pair every score with an action playbook so predictions trigger emails, discounts, or manual reviews instead of gathering dust. Track lift versus a control group so you know it’s actually moving the needle. If nobody acts on the score, it’s just a clever spreadsheet.
Plan for operations from day one. MLOps means versioned datasets, reproducible training, and drift monitoring for predictive models, while LLMOps means versioned prompts, retrieval settings, cost/latency tracking, and red-team tests for language apps. Keep a tiny evaluation set and run changes in staging before they hit users. Run two-to-four-week pilots with a clear start/stop and pre-agreed metrics; decide to scale, tweak, or stop based on those numbers. Stack wins into playbooks so the next team can copy success instead of reinventing it.
To learn more contact us at: https://www.aisteari.com/contact-us
